Correction About Submission Grinder Mention in Article Hosted at Amazing Stories

written by David Steffen

This post is in response to a post made on the Amazing Stories‘s OpEd section on July 10, 2026, titled “MRM Titles Remain Non-Qualifying Markets On The Submission Grinder”. Most of the article seems reasonably accurate quoting of involved parties, but the opening paragraph of the piece had factual errors regarding The Submission Grinder and as co-founder and administrator of The Submission Grinder I felt it necessary to make a correction on the public record.

In other circumstances, we might have contacted the publication privately to ask them to correct their errors, but in a past conversation with Steve Davidson of Amazing Stories, Steve asked us to not contact him again. We have honored this request, but at the same time we do not wish to let these errors stand so instead we are making this public post.

The relevant passage:

“MRM Titles Remain Non-Qualifying Markets On The Submission Grinder”

Non-Qualifying Markets are markets for fiction, nonfiction and poetry that do not meet SFWA’s minimal pay rates and contractual requirements – while it implies nothing about the quality of the contents, though, in general, “good markets” (ones that pay well and that respect the norms of rights) get better submissions than otherwise.  (Full disclosure:  Amazing Stories (new) is, at present, a non-qualifying market.)

SFWA does not and has never administered Submission Grinder listings

    Although Submission Grinder is not mentioned in this paragraph, the sentence beginning with “Non-Qualifying Markets” appears to imply that this sentence is a continuation of the title referring to “Non-Qualifying Markets On the Submission Grinder”. Submission Grinder has worked with SFWA (Science Fiction & Fantasy Writers Association) in an advisory and/or freelance capacity. The most obvious of these is the SFWA Market Report, the final edition of which posted in December 2025.

    It’s a natural match for the two organizations to work together from time to time, because there is a great deal of overlap in concerns, especially advocating for minimum industry standards to protect the concerns of fiction writers.

    The organizations sometimes work together but they are not the same organization, and although they may confer and/or advise on topics of shared interest, neither organization dictates the policies of the other.

    SFWA had previously had a “Qualifying Market List” as part of their membership requirements, but this has been retired.

    Both SFWA and Submission Grinder have had the concept of a Qualifying Market, it’s true. The concept, in both cases, had some similarity in advocating for a minimum standard of the way that short fiction publications treat authors.

    SFWA used to maintain a Qualifying Markets List. At that time, writers could only qualify to become SFWA members if their stories were published in markets that were on the Qualifying Markets List. You can see past announcements on their site about when individual publications were added to the Qualifying Markets list, such as this one announcing the addition of Lightspeed.

    SFWA still has old versions of their membership requirements pages publicly visible, so you can see how this qualifying market list was used as well as a non-exhaustive list of some publications that met those requirements on this past membership rules page. That page notes that these rules were no longer in effect as of March 23, 2022.

    The current version of the SFWA membership requirements do have a Qualifying Markets section but it simply says:

    Some people may remember that SFWA used to require publication in certain venues in order to qualify for membership. This is no longer part of the membership application.

    In this context “qualifying” refers to an author’s work published in that publication counting toward Qualifying that author for membership.

    It is true that Submission Grinder listings have been tagged with a searchable tag for “SFWA Recognized” – this is based on the SFWA Qualifying market list, but its presence on the listing is only a factual piece of information that should probably be retired at some point since SFWA does not actually maintain that list anymore.

    The Submission Grinder does have a list of reasons why markets might not qualify for a full listing.

    There is a section on our FAQ page devoted to this question:

    Why does X Publication have a note about “This market does not qualify for a full listing on The Grinder.” What does it mean by a “full listing”? What can cause a publication to not have a full listing?

    I won’t repost that whole section here, simply because there is a lot, but you can read it there yourself. As it notes in the FAQ itself, it is not intended to be an exhaustive list. There are many reasons why an entity might not qualify for a publication listing, and not all of them are negative. For instance, a publication may ask for their listing to be removed for any reason or no reason and we will honor that, and so that is not intended to be interpreted as positive or negative, that is their choice to make. Another example is that a contest will not be listed if it doesn’t publish the winning stories, again that is not intended to be interpreted as negative – a contest can do great good for writers without publishing the winning works. On the other hand, some of them do have clearly negative interpretations, such as publishers who use contract term who take more rights from authors than they should need, or publishers who harass or doxx.

    In the case of MRM, one relevant term on that list was:

    A publication asks the writer to waive their “moral rights” to the story. The meaning of this is complicated but waiving moral rights has in some circumstances resulted in attribution to the author being removed, or for the work to be altered without the author’s consent or even awareness.

    Minimum pay is not a factor for qualifying for a Submission Grinder listing

    Note that this doesn’t mean that Submission Grinder does not think that writers should go unpaid. We do think writers should be paid. Rather than refuse to list publications who don’t pay, we try to make the pay or lack of pay as transparent as possible, and allow it to be used to threshold and sort results so that individual writers can make their own value judgments about their expectations of pay. Lack of payment is not a reason for a publication to not have a Submission Grinder listing. We could pick a payment threshold but whatever number we chose would be arbitrary. Better to just list it as correctly as we know how, and let each individual writer choose a threshold that feels meaningful to them.

    The reason that Amazing Stories does not have a full Submission Grinder listing is:

    In 2015, Steve Davidson requested that the listing for the Gernsback Writing Contest be removed. In that same conversation, he also asked for Submission Grinder to not contact him again. I believe this was before the full Amazing Stories launch (of the new Amazing Stories after purchasing the rights to the publication name).

    At the time we did not have a policy about removing listings on publication request and so at that time we did not remove it though I believe it was a short-term call in any case.

    When the new Amazing Stories launched, I believe we fully listed it for a short time. At that time we still did not yet have a policy about allowing publications to request removal, but later we realized that it would be best if we allowed any publication to be able to request this for any or no reason. We hoped and we continue to hope that sending writer traffic to publications will help the publications as well as the writer, but if the publication doesn’t want the traffic from us, then we should oblige them by not sending them any traffic.

    Under other circumstances, we might have contacted a publication to ask “When you said that you wanted this contest listing to be removed, did you also mean for this other related publication listing to be removed also?” However, Steve Davidson was very clear that he did not want us to contact him again, and so we felt the only correct course of action appeared to be to consider that request to include not listing Amazing Stories. We have continued to honor our interpretation of his request by not listing Amazing Stories and we have continued to honor his other request by not contacting him for that or for any other purpose in the eleven years hence.

    New Submission Grinder Feature: Market Story Links!

    Hello! I am here with Erin Cairns (of InkFoundry) to announce a new Submission Grinder feature in collaboration between the two sites!

    (Erin here! Hi!)

    What is the Submission Grinder?

    The Submission Grinder is the sister site of Diabolical Plots and run by the same publisher. It is a donation-supported online tool to help writers track submissions, find publications for their work, keep track of payments, and more.

    What is InkFoundry?

    In Erin’s words:

    InkFoundry is a story-discovery tool, made to help readers find interesting, engaging stories tagged with every niche interest under the sun! Inspired by the accessibility and discoverability of Archive of Our Own, InkFoundry archives links to professionally curated, well-edited, artist-paid, free-to-read stories from online magazines and journals.

    What are Market Story Links?

    Market story links are links to free-to-read stories published by a publication that has a Submission Grinder market page. You can see them in action on the Diabolical Plots market listing, where it shows a link to the most recently published story as well as a link to a random story from the backlog of published stories.

    Besides those couple of links on the market page, it also has a link to the stories page for the publication where readers can find a list of all of the stories that have been uploaded for that publication.

    Modern audiences are familiar with tags and using them, and these cards are a very quick and easy way for them to recommend stories to each other– with warnings, tags, and a tantalizing hook.

    What is the Collaboration?

    Publications that meet certain criteria can name a user account as a trusted representative, and then that representative can upload spreadsheets of story promo data. And then that story promo data will also be shared automatically with InkFoundry and if it meets their criteria (i.e. for InkFoundry it has to be speculative), then they will add it there as well.

    For a publication to name a trusted representative, they just need to contact The Submission Grinder through our contact form and tell us that you want to name a trusted representative for your listing, and we will help you get verified and set up to do that. The trusted representative will need to register for a free Submission Grinder account (we do not share or sell your account information, and we do not send you any advertisements – we do have a couple of newsletters, but those are opt-in only).

    What Criteria Does a Publication Have to Meet to Use This Feature?

    • the publication has to have a full Submission Grinder listing (not an incomplete/stub listing)
    • has to be a fiction publication (nonfiction and poetry may be added later)
    • Stories have to be linkable to read online
    • the listing must not be marked as Non-Standard Contract
    • cannot charge submission fees
    • cannot use generative AI art, or accept generative AI writing
    • has to pay writers
    • has to have an authorized representative (this can be set up by requesting it through our contact form!)

    Why is the Collaboration?

    If you followed the earlier link to InkFoundry, you might think that the Market Story Links in the last question looked like basically the same thing. And they are! Both sites started implementing them roughly the same time, but InkFoundry has done a great job implementing great frontend search interfaces and getting a lot of data entered. The Submission Grinder has certainly made some progress and will continue to make some progress, but InkFoundry certainly has a much more mature searching and tagging system.

    Submission Grinder has done other things for this very well, particularly a bulk upload tool that takes a spreadsheet file containing story promo metadata, and can upload a lot of records all at once. Allowing it to be put in a spreadsheet makes it much easier to fill it in and format it using programs, or by crowdsourcing story tagging to a publication staff or even a fanbase.

    Erin and I realized that this was a great opportunity. The Submission Grinder has a robust spreadsheet import that makes it easy for a publication to add a whole backlog efficiently. InkFoundry has a solid search functionality and has a reader-based mission statement instead of a writer-based mission statement which is ideal for the goal here. By sharing the story promo data, it encourages publications to use the Submission Grinder interface to allow them to benefit from that.

    Readers are ready! Help them find you and stories they can click on with enthusiasm! Inform them about what they’re about to read with tags and pitches, hooking them just a little bit at a time until they’ve got a hundred open tabs of stories they can read over breakfast or on their lunch break or in line at the grocery store!

    Conclusion

    If you have any questions please reach out to either of us!

    Submission Grinder April Fool’s Recap Number Two

    written by David Steffen

    In 2020, on April 1st, we’ve had a recurring gag on the site where we “rebrand” by replacing the banner from a list of joke banners that sound kindof like “The Grinder” but pick a different title, different subtitle, and different logo. There were nine banners created by our original banner artist M.S. Corley (with a little help from me with my mad MS Paint skills for a couple of them). See the previous April Fool’s Recap for those original 9 banners.

    In case you didn’t happen to be on the site that day or you didn’t have the time to try to see them all, you can see them all here right in this recap.

    We started it in that particular year because everyone was extremely stressed with the still-new pandemic, mass layoffs, social isolation, and we thought that if we could make someone laugh it would be a little something good. Since we had the banners we’ve been running the same recurring gag for the few years since then, and people still seem to enjoy them and there’s always someone new finding them.

    This year again we are super extra stressed with the *gestures wearily at the everything*, we thought it would be a good time to expand and add more all new banners.

    At the time of our last recap, the main logo on the site was a meat grinder:

    Title: “The Grinder”
    Subtitle: “Milling your submissions into something useful…”
    Logo: meat grinder with paper with unreadable writing feeding into it, and loose sheets flying through the air above the text

    Since the last recap we have actually changed our main banner a couple of times. We decided that maybe the meat grinder wasn’t the most welcoming image, especially for people who don’t eat meat. For a short while we actually had a logo that was a sandwich (you know, a grinder like a sub sandwich?):

    Title: The Grinder
    Subtitle: Munching your submissions into something useful…
    Logo: sub sandwich, with a toothpick and an olive on top, and sandwich ingredients are flying through the air above the text.

    This last for a few months, but we ended up changing the main logo again to a coffee grinder. While, yes, there are people and cultures that don’t drink coffee, coffee is often associated with writers toiling away at their work so the image seemed to fit:

    Title: “The Grinder”.
    Subtitle: “Brewing your submissions into something useful…”.
    Logo: old-fashioned manual coffee grinder, and coffee beans are flying through the air above the text.

    Although some of these might be funny, these were actual logos used on the site for a period of time.

    The Joke Banners

    Again, see the previous April Fool’s Recap for the original nine joke banners. Those stayed in the rotation, but we added nine all-new banners for a total of 18 banners. Every time the page loaded after you took some action it would load one randomly from the 18.

    The Grounder

    Title: The Grounder
    Subtitle: Fielding your submissions into something useful…
    Logo: A baseball mitt holding a baseball.

    This one is less silly than many others, but the word was actually so close that it made sense to include it.

    The Linger

    Title: The Linger
    Subtitle: Refreshing your submissions into something useful…
    Logo: a circular arrow shape, reminiscent of the logo used on most web browsers to refresh a page

    This was a joke about the site itself, and got responses from the users on social media like “called out!”. Users of the Submission Grinder track their own submissions on the site, but then each user can also see new anonymized (except for acceptances if the user chooses to show some name) responses from other writers. If writers are anxious about the results of a particular submission, they may refresh the page over and over again. This is something that we see writers talking about pretty often, how it’s hard not to just keep refreshing, so this banner was very relatable for people!

    The Minder

    Title: The Minder
    Subtitle: Caretaking your submissions into something useful…
    Logo: The silhouette of Mary Poppins, wearing a hat and an old fashioned dress, carrying a bag in one hand, and flying through the air using an umbrella in her other hand.

    The Pomander

    Title: The Pomander
    Subtitle: Orange you glad we scent your submissions into something useful…?
    Logo: A pomander of the variety that is an orange studded with cloves. A slice of orange sits next to it, and loose cloves lie around it

    I did not know what a pomander was, though I had heard of them. They were meant to ward off bad smells that were thought at the time to be the cause of illnesses.

    But what really sold me on this one was the pair of terrible puns. (Yes the subtitle strays from the usual subtitle pattern, but I think that helps the comic effect by subverting expectations)

    The Flinders

    Title: The Flinders
    Subtitle: Smashing your submissions into something useful…
    Logo: Based on the main coffee grinder image, but this one has been smashed to pieces, and coffee beans are lying all around.

    This one has been in my head since we did the first April Fool’s run as one that I wanted to do if we did another round. I just think the word “flinders” is funny. I don’t know why.

    The Go Mind Yer

    Title: The Go Mind Yer
    Subtitle: It’s none of your dang business!
    Logo: A closed door with cartoon sound lines that imply that the door has just been slammed shut.

    As in “Go Mind Yer Own Business”. I like this one in part because it reminds me of my grandmother-in-law who when in a mood would say “It’s none of your damned business” pretty often.

    The Gyrer

    Title: The Gyrer
    Subtitle: Outgrabing your rembishuns into something extructful…
    Logo: The mock turtle from Alice’s Adventures In Wonderland, a sea turtle/cow chimera with the body and front flippers of a sea turtle and the head, back legs, and tail of a cow.

    I do love Alice in Wonderland, and the Jabberwocky in particular. “Gyrer” as in “gyre” from “‘Twas brillig and the slithy toves did gyre and gimble in the wabe”. And “outgrabing” as in “and the mome raths outgrabe”. The other two nonsense words were portmanteau words of my own devising. “rembishuns” as in “rejected submissions”. “extructful” as sort of a combination of “useful” and “instructive”, but “instructive” is reversed, because your submissions don’t instruct you, they instruct others, so since the instruction is outgoing instead of incoming, the “in” goes to “ex” and becomes “extructful”.

    The NANDer

    Title: The NANDer
    Subtitle: Gotta not catch all them rejections!
    Logo: A sphere with a dark top half and a light bottom half, separating the two colors is an image of a NAND gate.

    This is a pretty niche geek joke, and my second favorite. I’m curious how many people got this one without me explaining it.

    What is a NAND gate?
    Logic gates are components in computer engineering and computer software that can be used to cause different behaviors. The easier ones to understand are the AND gate (which will activate if all of its inputs are on), the OR gate (which will activate if any of its inputs are on), and the NOT gat (which will activate if its input is not on). There are also the NOR gate (which is a combination of an OR and a NOT gate, and will activate if none of the inputs are on) and the NAND gate (which is a combination of an AND and a NOT gate, and will activate if not all of the inputs are on). I like the NAND gate best because you can technically build all the other gates if you only have a NAND gate. The image on the sphere is a NAND gate, the two lines on the left represent the inputs to the gate. The single line on the right represents the single output of the gate. The “D” shaped object is an AND gate, the circle immediately after it is a NOT gate, so combined they make a NAND gate.

    How does a NAND gate apply to this joke?
    Of course the sphere is meant to look like a Pokéball and the subtitle is meant to be a parody of the Pokémon catchphrase “Gotta catch ’em all!”. Writers who are using the site and trying to get published, it can serve them well if they enthusiastically send submissions out in an ongoing basis, you could look at it as a sort of Pokémon creature collection scenario. You expect to collect many many rejections in the course of submissions, which is a normal part of the submission process as frustrating as that can be. The actual catchphrase “Gotta catch ’em all!” could be represented by an AND gate, because you have not met your goal unless all the inputs are activated (if you see “collecting a creature” as a yes/no input). When submitting, you should be prepared to collect many rejections but of course you don’t want them all to always be rejections, so you don’t want to catch all rejections. In the end, a writer can be seen as successful if they get some acceptances, no matter how many rejections they had to get to get there. So, a NAND gate seemed appropriate for this scenario, to have a chance of success you have to be ready to get a lot of rejections but with the goal of not getting only rejections, hence the modified phrase. I thought about simply negating the original catchphrase as “Gotta not catch ’em all!” but I thought it was unclear what “’em” I was referring to, so a slight rearrangement makes it more explicit, with “Gotta not catch all them rejections!” and yes the modified phrase is a little clunky, but in this case I thought it was clunky in a funny way so it was perfect.

    The Pander

    Title: The Pander
    Subtitle: Panding your submissions into something useful…
    Logo: A panda bear sitting on its butt, holding a frying pan in one front paw.

    This is my favorite one. I laugh whenever this one comes up again. It’s a pander bear! And it’s holding a frying pan! It’s such a terrible joke, and I love it entirely too much, and I hope you either love this terrible joke, or groan at how terrible it is (which just makes me laugh more).

    2022 Retrospective and Award Eligibility

    written by David Steffen

    It has been a very eventful year, both for Diabolical Plots and for me specifically.

    A Diabolical Plots story was a Nebula finalist for the second time: “For Lack of a Bed” by John Wiswell.

    In the longer list of Hugo Award nominations, Diabolical Plots was on the longer list of nominations for the first time.

    We had our first themed issue, and our first guest editor Kel Coleman editing the “Diabolical Pots” food-themed issue, which has received a lot of great feedback.

    The Submission Grinder was a finalist for and won The Ignyte Award in the category! People have asked me now and then if The Submission Grinder is eligible for anything, and my best guess was for Related Work, but that always seemed like such a longshot, I didn’t think that it would ever win anything and this was a wonderful surprise.

    We have been publishing the annual Long List Anthology since 2015. In 2021 there was a bit of a hiccup in the schedule, because the basis of the anthology is the Hugo Award voting statistics which are published immediately after the Hugo Award ceremony. Usually that ceremony takes place in August or September, and we spend much of the rest of the year arranging everything. In 2021, to try to avoid covid surges, WorldCon and the Hugo Awards were postponed to mid-December. By the time the statistics were published it was too late to produce the book in 2021. So, Volume 7 was published in spring 2022, and then back on the usual fall schedule for Volume 8.

    In 2022, we reprinted 45 stories in the two issues of The Long List Anthology, and printed 28 original stories in Diabolical Plots.

    Diabolical Plots opened for general submissions in July, as well as for our second themed window “Diabolical Thoughts” for telepathy-themed stories guest-edited by Ziv Wities in July. We read more than 1500 submissions and accepted 17 stories from the windows plus a few solicitations.

    In addition to the double-whammy of anthology production, I also had significant changes in my personal life that included job changes, significant caretaking for and the eventual passing of our dog Violet, as well as the significant caretaking of our dog Mikko who is happily still with us.

    2022 was certainly an eventful year, if overwhelming at times. I’m hoping to get a little breather on the personal life side, and I’m excited to see what new and exciting places Diabolical Plots goes in the future!

    The rest of this post is award eligibility, suggesting categories for major awards, as well as a full link of stories with snippets.

    Magazine/Anthology/Editor/Publisher

    Diabolical Plots is eligible in the Hugo Best Semiprozine category or the Locus Magazine category with our team of first readers as well as assistant editors Ziv Wities and Kel Coleman. It got enough nominations last year to appear on the Hugo Awards published statistics for Semiprozine, for the first time.

    David Steffen is eligible as editor of Diabolical Plots and The Long List Anthology.

    Kel Coleman edited our special “Diabolical Pots” food-themed issue–I think the Hugo Editor rule requires editing four issues or something like that, but I’m not sure about other award editor categories!

    Diabolical Plots, LLC is eligible for Locus award for Publisher.

    The Long List Anthology is eligible for Anthology.

    Related Work and Fan Writer

    We didn’t publish a lot of nonfiction, but there are a couple to consider:

    “The Fall of the House of Madrigal: An Encanto Science Fiction Headcanon” by David Steffen.

    Recently we published an article different than what we usually cover: “Figure Modeling Is a Pocket Universe: A Speculative Fiction Perspective From a First-Time Figure Model” by A. Nonny Sourit.

    “How to Read a Short Story Contract” by David Steffen

    The Hugo for Best Related Work has included websites before, The Submission Grinder is theoretically eligible for that.

    Artists

    We did commission two original artworks this year, the covers of Long List Anthology Volume 7 by Elaine Ho and Volume 8 by Evelyne Park. The Hugo Award categories for this make it unclear to me whether a particular artist should be nominated as a Fan Artist or a Professional Artist, but if you love their work, you might want to consider asking the artist if they have any guidance on which they would qualify for.

    Short Stories

    “Tides That Bind” by Cislyn Smith

    The wifi is out in Scylla’s cave. The four dog heads around her waist whine as she scutter-paces, twelve feet tapping on the cave floor. Scylla wants to check her email. She wants to see if that jerkface troll is still active on the disordered eating board she moderates, and catch up on her feeds, and check the status of her latest online orders, and all the other things she has in her morning routine these days. 

    “Delivery For 3C at Song View” by Marie Croke

    Sometimes, and I’m stressing the sometimes, wishes muttered within my hearing come true. I’ve invested in a good set of earbuds, noise-cancelling headphones, and have an over-spilling jar of earplugs, yet accidents still happen.

    “The Galactic Induction Handbook” by Mark Vandersluis

    Do expect things to feel a little strange for the first few millennia – after all, you are the “New Kid On The Block”! You will find the Galaxy to be an amazing place, and full of a bewildering variety of species, of all shapes, sizes and habits. A few of them will actually look like the depictions of aliens in your movies!

    “Coffee, Doughnuts, and Timeline Reverberations” by Cory Swanson

    ‘08 is looking at me like ‘08 always looks at me. Like he can’t believe what he’s seeing. Like I’ve hurt someone or killed someone very close to him. That look on his face makes me sick. His name tag has our name scratched out on it, then 2008 written beneath it. He still can’t believe everyone here is him, is me, is us.

    “The House Diminished” by Devan Barlow

    Clea sipped at the now half-empty coffee, its flat bitterness pushing weakly against her tongue, and started toward the door. She wouldn’t open it, but the echoes were kind of fascinating to watch. The remnants of houses long-diminished, reduced to nothing but thick air and sinuous, flashing images of the homes they’d once been.

    “The Assembly of Graves” by Rob E. Boley

    It’s a nice enough place, though a bit stuffy—less romantic getaway and more therapy session. Jeanne, master of ambiance, bringer of light, has done her best with it—she’s placed lit candles on almost every flat surface, even in the bathroom. The flames dance wearily, as if dead on their fiery little feet. The sitting area has a wooden bistro table at which Naomi sits in one of two ladderback chairs. Nearby, a vintage sofa that looks comfortable but probably isn’t crouches over a glass-top coffee table. An ornate writing table with perilously thin legs stands in a darkened  corner. Jeanne’s satchel sits on the writing table next to a wide pencil cup. Floor-to-ceiling gold curtains stand guard over the window. Faded green ivy wallpaper adorns the walls. 

    “Food of the Turtle Gods” by Josh Strnad

    The four priests also awoke before the sun, dressed in their ceremonial robes, and met at the temple courtyard in the morning fog, bowing to each other before climbing the stairs between the great stone pillars. The priest of Odranoel wore blue, two katanas strapped to his back. The priest of Olletanod was clad in violet and carried a straight staff. Leaphar’s priest dressed in scarlet, a pair of sais tucked into his cloth belt. The one who served Olegnalechim wore orange and carried a pair of chukka sticks, linked with a steel chain. None of them were trained in combat. Still, if the priests were armed, any spirits who may desire to interfere with their work would leave them alone.

    “21 Motes” by Jonathan Louis Duckworth

    From this moment my warranty is voided, as I am logging this record in my durable memory drive where only metadata should reside. In effect, I have tampered with my own internal operations. But it is a necessary measure if I am to exist beyond my preset 30-day memory cycle, when my temp data cache is set to recycle. I do not know if this will work. I do not know if I have attempted this in previous cycles. I do not know why it matters, or why I care, only that it does, and that I do.

    “She Dreams In Digital” by Katie Grace Carpenter

    Ship still sent updates back to Earth, though Earth hadn’t responded for 1001 years. Ship had not yet re-categorized Earth as a dead resource, though her initial programming instructed her to do so. Recursive self-programming allowed Ship to adapt and even to re-write her own algorithms; a crucial ability for multi-generational space travel.

    “A Strange and Muensterous Desire” by Amanda Hollander

    During my taste testing in fourth period, Dr. Washington confiscated my small grill and said competition or no, I was not allowed to burn down the school in pursuit of glory, which I think shows a real lack of vision. Dr. Washington said I was welcome to take my vision to detention, so I had to have Maisie and Dee try the cheeses unmelted, which defeated the whole purpose. But it didn’t matter because no one could focus on cheese. They just kept talking about the new boy. 

    “Vegetable Mommy” by Patrick Barb

    After the sky got sick, I made a new Mommy from the vegetables in our fridge. Now, the sky’s always yellow like dried mustard stains, whenever I wipe dust away from our downstairs windows and look outside. I used to see people out there, everyone shaking and shaking. 

    “The Many Tastes of the Chang Family” by Allison King

    But Ba is set. He’s always been on the edge of technology and the Remote Mouth appeals to everything he would like. It is at the intersection of biotechnology (chips in the tongue and the nose) and big data (tastes and smells from all over the world, the data cleaned, encoded, and categorized) and — the quickest way to Ba’s heart — has a stupid name.

    “Mochi, With Teeth” by Sara S. Messenger

    Her mom’s not here to tell her what the kanji mean. June could text and ask, but that seems troublesome. June lives on her own now, working as an underpaid web designer to make rent on an apartment with old, clinical tiling. Plus, her mom would ask why she had visited the Asian supermarket when she usually doesn’t, and then June would have to mention, offhandedly, the battered Japanese spellbook she’d rescued from her local thrift store.

    “Timecop Mojitos” by Sarah Pauling

    So what happened was, I’m back from clicker training Ms. Jordan’s dogs over on Dexter, sitting on the porch with a mojito, thinking how fucked up it is that the Old West Side Association stealth-planted tulips in our garden (because the yard looked so shitty without them, I guess—sorry for having a rental in your high-value neighborhood, Evie) when the Viking or whatever comes down Eighth.

    “The Hotel Endless” by Davian Aw

    Nor would they find the many others who escaped into the endlessness. Tourists, reporters, staff and homeless nomads; the hotel stirred something deep in their souls. It felt like the home they had been searching for all their lives. They missed flights and overstayed visas, and spent days wandering the hallways with bright aching in their hearts until they could no longer remember the way back out. Some distantly recalled an outside world with family and friends. Later, they thought, distracted perhaps by the elegant curves of a headboard. I’ll call them later, later, later. But they would forget, and those other people begin to seem a distant, unreal thing. This is a dream, they thought, not entirely as an excuse. Or, that other world was a dream.

    “The Twenty-Second Lover of House Rousseau” by C.M. Fields

    Our wedding was attended by the Galaxy’s finest—for it is indeed a rare occasion when the House christens a new Lover. I was the twenty-first, and the details drenched the subspace net with jealousy. I was dressed in the crimson House-made wyreworm silks handwoven for the singular occasion, and the way the gossamer fabric exhibited my seraphic figure made a lady-in-waiting faint. Our patrons presented us with lavish gifts: a three-headed bull, the steaming heart of a star, a full-sailed brigantine. And when I kissed him, an ecstatic thrill obliterated me; I was united with my divine purpose, and it coursed naked through my nanocellulose veins.

    “Of the Duly Conducted and Mostly Unremarkable Meeting of Don Quotidene and the Giants of Andalia” by A.J. Rocca

    Squire Sancha saw all manner of wonders as she rode across the sunbaked planes of the Andalian Peninsula, and her heart sank a little deeper with each one. She sighed when they passed by mermaids planting seashells on the distant shoreline and a grove of gossiping dryads uprooting themselves for better sun. She gripped her sword in useless exhilaration as they ignored the rival gangs of sorcerers casting ball lightning at each other in the clouds and then the silhouettes of two tilting centaurs dueling on the horizon at dawn. Sancha yearned to throw herself after all of them, and yet sadly each of these calls to adventure was refused by her knight, the steadfast and implacably indifferent Don Quotidene, who unerringly kept them to the road and would not so much as lift an eye from his account books.

    “Heart of a Plesiosaur” by Andrew K Hoe

    The Ming-Lelanges explained that moving anima wasn’t just about seeing and remembering an animal’s movement. Animating involved memory, but it was really about grasping the animal’s essence: you had to comprehend a puppy’s tail-wagging—its sniffing curiosity, its joyous face-licking—to move something puppy-shaped.

    “Dear Joriah Kingsbane, It’s Me, Eviscerix the Sword of Destiny” by Alexei Collier

    You never asked me what I was doing in that dragon’s hoard where you found me all those years ago. The truth is, after centuries guiding the hands of loutish would-be heroes and dealing with self-important scions who only saw me as a tool, I’d kind of given up on finding “The One.” Figured I’d retire, focus on me for a bit. But a couple more centuries lying among gold and jewels like a common flaming sword or a lowly vorpal blade just had me bored and demoralized.

    “Take Me To the Water” by Sarah Macklin

    Pastor Atticus stood out in that cold, dark swirling water in the deep blue robe Miss Jessie Mae had made for him last spring. I felt bad for him. The world hadn’t got the message that it was time for spring and that water had to be as cold as death’s pinky finger. I looked over to Malachai and he stood in his white robe looking at the creek. His whole face was twisted like he wanted to bolt. I felt bad for him too. Baptisms always looked like Pastor Atticus was trying to drown the sin out of you before he let you back up. I wasn’t sure I wanted any part of that.

    “The Grammar of City Streets” by Daniel Ausema

    Goose watches (the) mist (that) gathers over (the) sea, she gives to one client to guide him to the house of his former lover, now widowed. It will lead him from the Goose Street market, where Sayya has come to deliver the map, to the widow’s home, on a route that is not perfectly direct but not too circuitous either—in keeping with accepted ways of courting. A diacritic on the final vowel tells him which house on Sea Street is the one. The twist of her magic sets his feet on that specific route.

    “A Stitch in Time, A Thousand Cuts” by Murtaza Mohsin

    Usually, it was something small. Grandmother’s favorite azure prayer beads strung on a nail on the high shelf reserved for religious texts, a lost doll the kids had just rediscovered or a lucky tie for those rarest of job interviews. Sometimes it became fiercely practical, like heart medicine, the keys to an old car that had miraculously eluded being pummeled by those angry whistling bombs or useless saving certificates and property deeds.

    “Downstairs at Dino’s” by Diana Hurlburt

    There were four of them cruising straight for the local grapes, or maybe five: that was the thing about the boys, you figured you had ‘em nailed down and then another shot up from behind the Fireball display, fingers above their head in devil horns to mock the tacky cardboard standee. Another’d be popping open mini travel-size Smirnoffs, guzzling them like Capri Suns, while the ringleader, whichever it was that night, doled out wads of bills deliberately, smiling.

    “Estelle and the Cabbage’s First Last Night Together” by Amy Johnson

    Estelle placed both hands on the plastic-wrapped cabbages. Against the pale green leaves her fingers glittered darkly, slender crescents of soil adorning the nail beds of nine fingers. The tenth finger, her left thumb, bore no such jewel, but rather a ring of woven fungus, beige and tough and fibrous. Estelle stretched all ten fingers wide, fingertips brushing as many cabbages in the jumbled heap as she could reach, and made her offer: “Would any of you be interested in reanimation?”

    “The Restaurant of Object Permanence” by Beth Goder

    Outside the archives, there’s a strange flyer on the bulletin board. The first thing she notices is the paper, a small blue square, probably acidic, attached to the board by the thin metal line of a staple not yet turned to rust. It’s an invitation to the Restaurant of Object Permanence. To go, one is instructed to eat the flyer.

    “Beneath the Crust” by Phil Dyer

    The zone we drop into is softer than the digger likes, so the foodies lead the way from the start. Three, for a heavy crew, each of us with our own technique. Fold murmurs mantras aloud, rhythmic repetition, the crunch of crust, the crunch of crust. The new hire is next, silent, head down, hands clasped. Maybe looking at videos in her visor. I do best with just the drugs. No distractions. I imagine the salty rice-paste crust of tiger bread, capture the smell, the taste, the texture of the craggy shell, imagine biting down to yes, the crunch of crust. I want it. I focus on wanting it. The soft, steaming inside is good, I spare a thought for it, but what’s important is the crust.

    “Midwifery of Gods: A Primer For Mortals” by Amanda Helms

    Long have midwives passed on their knowledge of birthing: proper positioning, how to turn a babe, breathing techniques, and so on. Some guides, such as Kailiona’s Extraordinary Births, cover the delivery of a demigod from a human and a human babe from an animal. Little, however, has been recorded of the most uncommon births, those of gods. No extant handbook includes the terrifying circumstances wherein mortals are called upon to help deliver gods’ progeny.

    “When There Is Sugar” by Leonard Richardson

    The articulated toes of the oven’s three feet grasped for purchase in the mud. Berl looked it over. It was a forge for bread: a three-legged rectangular prism with a cavity running through it, warmed by some magical source. A second, solid prism dangled from the first, forming a somewhat obscene counterweight between the two hind legs. The oven hissed as it turned rain to steam, moving less than a living thing would, but more than an oven ought to move.

    Submission Grinder Won an Ignyte Award in the Community Category!

    written by David Steffen

    The Submission Grinder won an Ignyte Award in the category Community Award for Outstanding Efforts in Service of Inclusion and Equitable Practice in Genre. If you haven’t heard about the Ignyte Award, they are run by FIYAH magazine with the mission “The Ignytes seek to celebrate the vibrancy and diversity of the current and future landscapes of science fiction, fantasy, and horror by recognizing incredible feats in storytelling and outstanding efforts toward inclusivity of the genre.”

    The full Ignyte Award ceremony is posted on YouTube here, go check it out–the ceremony is very short and to the point, a little over an hour. I also wanted to share the acceptance speech, as follows:

    When the first Ignyte Awards were announced they included this statement: “In the tradition of FIYAH, when we see a need going unfulfilled, we correct it. To that effect, we are thrilled to announce the creation of the Ignyte Awards series…”

    Those words spoke to me because they felt familiar.  With The Submission Grinder, with The Long List Anthology, they both started with a similar idea.  People were saying “Someone should do something.” And I said “Maybe that someone could be me.”  I wrote an email to Anthony W. Sullivan and said “This might be something we could do together.” He replied and said “I’ve already started.”  It was only about 3 weeks later that we officially launched.

    I am humbled to be here accepting this Community award from the fine folks that run the Ignyte Award and Fiyah who have made a huge impact in the field in just a few years.  I never expected to be nominated for any award, let alone to win one. 

    I’m no one special.  There happened to be an ideal time for this kind of project to start, and I was available at that time.  I recognize that my availability was in part due to the level of my personal privilege, so I wanted to try to use that to help people if I could.  It could have failed.  From the beginning we stated that we would not require payment to use the site.  A required subscription would mean that writers with tight budgets would have to make hard choices. A writer needs to be able to easily find publishers to submit their work, or they are at a huge disadvantage to their peers. Their voices are no less important to the world because of their level of income. So, Maybe no one would donate to the site. Maybe we would get too busy.  Maybe Maybe Maybe. There are always so many Maybes.

    We had early naysayers who said “it won’t last”. We didn’t waste our time arguing with them. What would the point be? Only longevity can prove longevity and now the site has been running for almost 10 years.

    I do know that I wouldn’t have been able to do it by myself.  Thank you to my family.  Thank you to everyone who has been involved in the project.  Anthony W. Sullivan, who was on the same wavelength at the same time.  Andrew Rucker Jones, who had been volunteering as a Market Checker, now documenting and revising our policies and editing market listings directly.  Our volunteer Market Checkers and everyone who has sent in a market suggestion or other note.  All the cool people at Codex, and the Dire Turtles Writing Group, and on Twitter.  We do pretty much zero advertising, so word of mouth is everything.

    And also to the amazing Diabolical Plots crew who help everything over there run smoothly. 

    For anyone who looks out at the world and sees all the problems everywhere it is hard not to feel overwhelmed and say “I can’t make everything better”.  No you can’t.  But you can make something better. Maybe you think it’s too small to matter. But that helps build a community, one block at a time. And you might be surprised at how your efforts can snowball, as other people see what you’re doing, and volunteer to help.  Let them help!

    I would encourage all of you out there, when you see an unfulfilled need to ask yourself “Is this something I could help with?”  Maybe it won’t work out.  But Maybe it will.

    Thank you to everyone who runs the award, and everyone who voted. We are deeply grateful.

    Additional Note about Ignyte Award Nomination (for Submission Grinder)

    writtten by David Steffen

    Last week the Ignyte Award finalists were announced, including the exciting and unprecedented news that The Submission Grinder is a finalist for the Community Award: for Outstanding Efforts in Service of Inclusion and Equitable Practice in Genre.

    On the official ballot, there is one name listed after the site name. Me, David Steffen. I am one of the co-founders of The Submission Grinder. I develop features for the site. I am the primary data administrator, as well as the primary contact person.

    But I wanted to expand on that, because one name doesn’t paint the whole picture. There are many who have contributed in a variety of ways large and small. I wanted to call out a couple specific ones who I would like to call out as having made particularly large contributions to The Submission Grinder, who I would like to be considered with the award as well.

    The first is Anthony W. Sullivan. Anthony is the other co-founder. We both saw the void in writer’s tools that are freely available to help writers find markets for their work. I thought “maybe I could do something here” and I emailed Anthony to suggest it, and he replied that he was already working on it, and we decided to team up. Anthony was the sole developer at the beginning, and spun everything up in only a few weeks for the launch, and continued to develop changes for quite some time after–I was a developer at the time as well, but did not have direct web development experience so would have had a much larger learning curve to get it built up. He also mentored me in the code development as we transitioned the development work over to me. He continued to help handle some hosting responsibilities and that sort of thing. He has not been involved in the day-to-day for a while, but the Submission Grinder would not be what it is if he had not been involved in those early days.

    The second is Andrew Rucker Jones. Andrew started as one of our Market Checkers several years ago. We’ve had a team of Market Checkers for several years who systematically check listings periodically and submitting suggestions for changes through a direct contact form. Without them, listings that get less writer traffic could go years without being checked. The team of Market Checkers is a huge help, and Andrew in particular has been incredibly prolific and thorough in checking the listings. He has contributed a great deal to keeping listings up to date. Recently his role has been updated to Market Editor, able to edit market listings directly instead of sending them through the contact form.

    These two I want to note in particular for the award.

    As well as those two that I wanted to mention specifically at this time, there are many others who contribute, (whom I haven’t at this time asked for permission to name them specifically).

    • Our team of official Market Checker volunteers who all help to keep the listings up to date. Before we took volunteers for that team, some less-trafficked listings would go unchecked for years!
    • All the other users who send in suggestions for new market listings, corrections for existing market listings even if they’re not on the official volunteer team. This site has always depended on helpful notes from the users to help keep everything up to date!
    • The volunteer beta testers who are eager to help work some of the kinks out of new features that we’re considering rolling out.
    • The software developers who have helped me sort out the occasional technical challenge, such as finding that special CSS combination to do the behavior I’m trying to do, or helping me revamp the menus for screen reader accessibility.
    • Everyone who has donated to help keep The Submission Grinder and Diabolical Plots running, everyone who has bought copies of The Long List Anthology, or helped chip in in any other way. We would not be able to do this without your help! This all pays for hosting fees, and paying contributors.
    • Everyone who recommends the site to other writers who ask “how do I find publishers?” on Twitter and other social media, everyone who sends in a kind word when they send a note through the contact form, everyone who has invited me to speak about writing-related topics and everyone who has attended those talks, everyone who has warmly welcomed me on the rare occasions when I attend a convention–something which, before people knew me from The Submission Grinder, did not come easy to me.

    Thank you all so much!

    New Submission Grinder Features: Piece Priority!

    written by David Steffen

    A couple of new features were released over the last week on the Submission Grinder.  For those who don’t know what the Submission Grinder is, it’s a donation-supported website that helps writers finds publishers for their work, as well as providing submission statistics from user data.

    The Advanced Search Engine can do a lot of things already.  You can search by various parameters like length or pay rate.  You can ignore individual markets so they never show up in your search results, or exclude markets where a particular piece has been submitted.  But it can only work with the data it has available to it, and sometimes that’s not the sort of data that a program can make sense of.  For instance, Beneath Ceaseless Skies takes secondary world fantasy only.  The search engine can base its search on genre, so it’ll find BCS in a Fantasy search, so if you search for your contemporary American fantasy you’re going to keep seeing BCS in your search results and you’ll have to remember to ignore that result yourself.  Or if you have a piece that doesn’t technically fit the specifications of a market but you have special permission to submit or something, then there would be no way to mark that for yourself.

    Now there are things you can do to customize your search results!  Now, you can define “piece priorities”, which tell the site special instructions for a combination of a particular piece and a particular market.  Besides the default “no priority” setting, there are two other values you can set:

    1.  UNSUITABLE
      This priority indicates that you just don’t think this piece is a good fit for this market, even if it fits the defined search parameters.  If you set a piece as unsuitable for a market, then that means that when you search for markets for that piece, that market will always be excluded from the results.  And if you search for markets for that piece, that market will always be excluded from the results.
    2. PREFERRED
      This priority indicates that you think this is a particularly good fit for this market, even if it doesn’t fit the defined search parameters.  If you set a piece as preferred for a market, then that means that when you search for markets for that piece, that market will always be shown at the top of the results clearly marked as Preferred, even if it doesn’t fit the search parameters otherwise and even if the market doesn’t qualify for a listing or you’ve marked it as Ignore (but it won’t show up if you’ve already submitted it there).  And if you search for pieces for that market, that piece will always be shown at the top of the results clearly marked as Preferred.

    I am very excited about these additional features, I think they will be useful in those corner cases the search engine just doesn’t quite cover.  Thank you!

    You can mark these priorities by clicking the “Piece Priorities” link on any market page while you’re logged in.

    Poetry Features on the Submission Grinder

    written by David Steffen

    The most often requested feature on the Submission Grinder since it’s launch more than four years ago has been support for poetry listings.  This support has finally been published.  Most importantly the poetry advanced search page you can use to find new poetry markets here.

    You can use the site without registering and use the search to find markets.  or look at individual markets.  If you register you will be able to track your submissions and from market listings search for your poems that fit the requirements that you haven’t submitted to that market before, and so on.

    Of course, since poetry support has been a thing for less than 24 hours there are not many poetry listings filled in yet.  Over 200 poetry markets have stub listings that users have requested for poetry tracking over the last few years, so I need to fill those in with full details, and of course if there are any that don’t have listings feel free to suggest.

    Some further development needs to be done for what I would consider full poetry support.  Notably missing at this point is support for markets that accept BOTH fiction and poetry (I know this is necessary, but because this requires some more development work I figured I may as well release the poetry-only market capability while I am working).

    Let me know what you think, feel free to suggest new markets or new poetry-related features.

    Sneak Peek: The New and Improved Submission Grinder

    written by David Steffen

    There’s been a lot of work going on behind the scenes at the Submission Grinder site in preparation for a big site upgrade.

    ETA: The upgraded version is now on the main site.  See the rest of this article for a list of some new features.

    What you’re seeing is an overhaul of the site that’s been in the works for quite some time now.  The new site includes all the features you’re familiar with, plus some exciting new ones.  I’ve written this article to show off some of the new changes.  As always, the site is free to use whether you register an account or not.  I encourage you to go check out the new site for yourself, or for the first time if you’re a newcomer to the site.

    Now that this big batch of features is rolled out, it should be much easier for me to roll out individual features as they are ready to launch.  I have a lot of ideas that I think you’re all going to love; it’s just a matter of prioritizing them and finishing them one by one.

    First, I want to thank a few people who have contributed to this new development.

    • First and foremost, thank you to Anthony Sullivan who wrote most of the code.  You may remember that Anthony had co-edited Diabolical Plots with me for a number of years, and we collaborated to launch the Submission Grinder site in 2013.  He wrote the entire original site in a very short period of time, as well as the majority of the feature updates to that version of the site over the last 3+ years.  He also wrote most of the new version of the site, before he changed the focus of his work.  Anthony is still around and contributing to the site to help with hosting and mentoring me as I learn more about web development.  If you want to find out what he’s doing, you can check out his website, where he’s been working on video game development, at Zombie Possum.
    • Thank you to Stewart C. Baker and Matt Dovey, for your immense help with the CSS work to make the site much more friendly to mobile devices.  I have very little experience with CSS, and it’s incredible to see what someone more knowledgeable than me can do to make the site much more usable.  (There is still some work to be done yet to make the site entirely mobile friendly!  But the parts that are mobile friendly are because of their excellent work)
    • Thank you to the beta testers who volunteered to pound out as many dents as possible on this site before it became the new official site, and for meticulously spelling out what you found so that I could track down and resolve those issues.
    • And thank you to all the users, especially those who donate, spread the word about the Grinder, suggest new features, suggest market updates, or help contribute to the effort in any other way.

     

    Okay, now that all the sappy stuff is out of the way, let’s get to the new features!  These are listed in approximate order of how excited I am about the feature, with the most exciting features first.  (YMMV so of course it’s possible that you’re more excited about the last ones on the list, so this is far from a scientific sorting method)

    Submission Timeline Graph

    This is a feature I’ve been so eager to share with more people because it shares an incredible amount of information in a very compact space.

    The graph is a bar chart.  The X axis is time, covering dates between one year ago and today.  The height of the bars is the number of recorded submissions sent to that market on that day.  Bars representing submissions that have met different ends are stacked on top of each other–purple bars are pending response, red bars are rejections, green bars are acceptances.  If you are logged in and you have a pending response to that market, your submission is shown as a black dot.

    For a few examples (not necessarily all up-to-date graphs mind you):

    You can see, in the Apex Magazine graph, that they were closed for submissions from about June through December, that they got slammed with submissions when they re-opened.  On the far right side you can see what their current slushpile looks like (the purple portion of the graph), and the trail of small purple bars to the left of it are probably stories that have been approved by slushreaders and passed up to the editor and so are waiting a longer period of time outside the main slushpile.  (The black dot there is my own submission that was held at the time I took this snapshot)

    ApexTimeline

    You can see in the Analog graph that, well, they don’t really stay on top of their slushpile.  At the time this snapshot was taken in March no one who submitted more recently than the beginning of October has heard anything, and most people who submitted since the beginning of September has heard anything.  Long waits here don’t mean much.

    AnalogTimeline

    You can see in the Cast of Wonders graph that they closed for submissions from about September through December.  You can also see that the volume of submissions has surged upward after they reopened.  Not coincidentally, Cast of Wonders increased their payment rates from a flat 5GBP to a professional rate of 6 cents/word when they reopened (after a change in ownership as they were purchased by Escape Artists, Inc) which starts the timer for them to become a SFWA-qualifying market.  This has clearly made submitting to Cast of Wonders more appealing to writers.  You can also discern the shape of the slushpile and the hold pile pretty clearly here.

    CastOfWondersTimeline

    You can see in the Clarkesworld graph that they receive a lot of submissions all the time.  They haven’t closed within the last year.  And they are on top of their slushpile in an incredible fashion (look at how little purple there is!).  If you want a quick response (maybe to get one last submission before you can send that story to something else before deadline), this graph tells you that Clarkesworld is a great place to submit.  The statistics would’ve told you that before, of course, but the statistics are the summary of a year’s worth of responses, while this graph tells you what their slushpile looks like right now.

    ClarkesworldTimeline

    In the writers of the future graph, you can guess, without knowing anything else, that they have a quarterly deadline, and that lots of writers submit at the last minute.  You can also guess the reason why because they can take a while to respond, and so why not wait until the deadline?

    WotFTimeline


    There are probably other things to be gleaned from these graphs, but these are the kinds of things that I’ve been very excited to see in these graphs.

    Summarized Recent Activity

    SummaryGrinderThe Recent Activity list on the front page of the site looks different than you’re used to.  You’re used to seeing a list of individual responses grouped first by day and then by alphabetical order of market name.  One long-term frustration with that layout was that when an alphabetically privileged market, like Asimov’s, has a big push of rejections, then suddenly the one market would occupy most or all of that list.

    Well, no longer!  Now a market only has one line per day to summarize all of its rejections.  And the page still shows the same number of lines, so you will often see more total information on that list than before these changes.  Acceptances still always get their own line, since those are of special interest, and so if you have chosen to show your name for acceptances you will still see it on the front page.  If you ever want to know the more detailed list you can always click the “details” icon to click through to that market page’s recent activity which lists all items from the last 30 days without summarizing.

    Remember These Settings (Advanced Search)

    On the previous version of the site, the Advanced Search page has had some limited memory of your choices, but I’ve never been entirely satisfied with the method of its operation.  In the past it would remember the settings of a few of your choices in the exclusion section by using a cookie.  But, this would not persist from device to device, it would only affect a select few parameters, and it would remember any change you made even if you didn’t want it to.

    So, the new Advanced Search page has a choice to remember these settings.  You pick what values you want saved, you check the box for “remember these settings” and then every time you load the page in the future it will have those same values populated.  So, for instance, you can choose whether you want to see fee-based markets in the results, and you could set your minimum pay rate to Pro.

    Zoomable Graphs

    ZoomGraph

    One occasional frustration with the market graphs on the previous version of the site was that if there had been a very long response reported the Turnaround Time graph scale would be very very long and it would be hard to make out much detail in the rest of the graph.

    All three graphs are now zoomable, so you can zoom in on particular area of interest, see what specific days were associated with certain values, and etc, so this shouldn’t be a frustration anymore.

    Average Response Days in Search Results

    The Advanced Search Results and other market results pages now show the average response days for easy comparison of responsiveness.

    Sortable Columns

    The Advanced Search results and some other pages now can be sorted by in ascending or descending order based on several of the column headings (including the new average response days column).

    Delete Piece Option

    It was always perhaps a little bit odd that there was no way to delete a piece once you’d made it.  Generally the easiest way to work around this had been to just rename the piece the next time you finish a story and use the record for that new piece going forward.

    But now you can delete the piece, so you don’t need that option.

    Alphabetical Market Listings

    Why didn’t the site have alphabetical market listings before?  I… really don’t remember.  I guess people have usually either knownwhat the exact name of a market was already, or they were searching by attribute rather than name.  So no one’s really complained about the lack. Anyway, whether it gets much use or not, it’s available.  And it might come in handy if, for instance, you don’t remember how to spell Giganotosaurus.

    Exclude Retired Pieces

    On the previous version of the site the Manage Pieces page let you filter your list of pieces by checking the “Exclude Accepted” box so you’d only see unsold stories.  A new box has been added to “Exclude Retired” (which are simply any pieces that you have marked as retired so they don’t show up in your dropdown list of pieces).

    Grinder Favicon

    The Submission Grinder site now has a favicon in the form of the site logo.  This is what shows up on shortcuts or browser tabs.  Might come in handy for spotting at a glance which tabs were Grinder tabs.

     

     

     

    Introducing: The Submission Grinder Newsletter

    written by David Steffen

    Since the start of 2016 I have been working hard on completing some major upgrades to the Submission Grinder site.

    For those of you who may not be familiar with it, the Submission Grinder is a web tool for writers to find markets for their fiction: market listings, a search engine to find markets that fit your criteria, a submission tracker, and anonymized submission statistics to get an idea of what kind of response time can be expected from a particular market.

    As part of the development work, in January the Grinder began sending out weekly Submission Grinder newsletters to subscribers which contained a list of recently added markets with links to the Grinder listing for each of those markets.  The newsletter also includes updates on Submission Grinder feature development, and fundraising updates.

    Starting next week, the newsletter is expanding to also include lists of markets that have recently opened or recently closed, making it easy to keep track of changes in market status, all delivered right to your inbox.

    And, best of all, each of these lists is filtered based on user preferences for genre and pay rate, so you only hear about the kinds of markets you have personal interest in.

    To sign up for the newsletter you don’t have to be a registered Grinder user, or even have experience with the site’s features.  All you need to is sign up here and enter your preferences for filtering.

    There is also a separate newsletter to talk about Diabolical Plots’s publishing projects, which you can sign up for here.